"I see no reason for calling my work poetry except that there is no other category in which to put it."
--Marianne Moore

Marianne Moore's debacle in this quote alludes to something that I have recently been thinking about quite a lot both personally and theoretically-- classification. The boundaries that society and communities have set in order to identify has resulted in the need to classify. I have been in the position lately which makes me wonder what happens when the classifications no longer are effective or true? As an English major just recently getting involved with newer digital media, I find myself wondering where I land. I admit that I was resistant to the idea of the humanities delving into an arena that no longer is defined by the traditional paper forms. However, as I begin to further investigate the ways in which the web an applications such as Facebook and Twitter are transforming communication, it seems necessary even urgent that those interested in the humanities begin to explore digital representation.

Especially working with Moore's letters in the library, the concepts of permanence and access come to mind. An original letter from a famous author has survived 99 years, and because of its preservation I am able to read it in the space in which she wrote it. There is something fundamentally different about reading a handwritten letter with the 1909 Bryn Mawr class insignia as opposed to reading in an edited compilation that has been typed and published. How is the pictorial replication of the original on the website going to transform and create hybrid of those experiences?

All of these questions and more have taken over my brain. I'd love to hear what you think. Stayed tuned for my review of the NINES website and a trip back to Canaday.

Posted by jenrajchel on November 19, 2009
Tags: Uncategorized

Total comments on this page: 2

How to read/write comments

Comments on specific paragraphs:

Click the icon to the right of a paragraph

  • If there are no prior comments there, a comment entry form will appear automatically
  • If there are already comments, you will see them and the form will be at the bottom of the thread

Comments on the page as a whole:

Click the icon to the right of the page title (works the same as paragraphs)

Comments

No comments yet.

Jocie on whole page :

I think that a pictorial representation of an original poem could change a reader’s experience of the poem significantly. I’m not just agreeing with you because I am already excited about your thesis, but for another reason as well.

Last year when I was abroad to Florence, I studied Futurist poetry in an Italian literature class. Futurist poetry is known for its incoherent and nonsensical form, made up of words such as Rann tammm tamm zoot. (It was kind of ridiculous, I’m not going to lie. Just imagine what their MUSIC sounded like. It was ten times worse.) But what I have written down for you here no where near represents the true experience of the poem. For each word of the original poem is also a piece of art, with its own font, size and placement on the page. And when I was lucky enough to see an original copy of the work, I was able to see and understand a whole new side of the poem that I wasn’t able to previously understand when it had simply been typed out.

February 24, 2010 4:16 pm
Jocie on whole page :

Here’s an image of a futurist poem by Marinetti, who wrote the futurist manifesto. Enjoy!

http://nti.btk.pte.hu/dogitamas/BHF_FILES/html/46Fried-Szkarosi/cd/images/MARINETTI/PV/marinetti_marcia_1916.jpg

February 26, 2010 5:22 pm
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI