"I see no reason for calling my work poetry except that there is no other category in which to put it."--Marianne Moore
Posted by jenrajchel on November 19, 2009
Tags: Uncategorized
"I see no reason for calling my work poetry except that there is no other category in which to put it."--Marianne Moore
Posted by jenrajchel on November 19, 2009
Tags: Uncategorized
No comments yet.
I think that a pictorial representation of an original poem could change a reader’s experience of the poem significantly. I’m not just agreeing with you because I am already excited about your thesis, but for another reason as well.
Last year when I was abroad to Florence, I studied Futurist poetry in an Italian literature class. Futurist poetry is known for its incoherent and nonsensical form, made up of words such as Rann tammm tamm zoot. (It was kind of ridiculous, I’m not going to lie. Just imagine what their MUSIC sounded like. It was ten times worse.) But what I have written down for you here no where near represents the true experience of the poem. For each word of the original poem is also a piece of art, with its own font, size and placement on the page. And when I was lucky enough to see an original copy of the work, I was able to see and understand a whole new side of the poem that I wasn’t able to previously understand when it had simply been typed out.
Here’s an image of a futurist poem by Marinetti, who wrote the futurist manifesto. Enjoy!
Comments on specific paragraphs:
Click the
icon to the right of a paragraph
Comments on the page as a whole:
Click the
icon to the right of the page title (works the same as paragraphs)